Understanding peacebuilding consolidating the peace process


22-Jun-2016 00:56

There is now broad consensus that inconsistent policies and fragmented programmes entail a higher risk of duplication, inefficient spending, a lower quality of service, difficulty in meeting goals and, ultimately, a reduced capacity for delivery.There is, however, a considerable gap between the degree to which the benefits of coherence are held to be of self-evident and operational reality.It is possible, however, to distinguish between systems where there is less, or more, coherence, and coherence is thus about degree during a process, not about an end-state.Coherence also needs to be understood in the context of the natural tensions, and therefore trade-offs, between the four elements of coherence.In this paper ‘coherence’ is understood as the effort to direct the wide range of activities undertaken in the political, development, human rights, humanitarian, rule of law and security dimensions of a peacebuilding system towards common strategic objectives..It is important to recognise, however, that the dynamic and non-linear nature of complex systems means that coherence can never be fully attained (Cilliers 2002).This article analyses the coherence and coordination dilemma in peace-building and post-conflict reconstruction systems, with special reference to the United Nations’ integrated approach concept.

understanding peacebuilding consolidating the peace process-46

dating ru dina

understanding peacebuilding consolidating the peace process-8

bbw lovers dating site

The Utstein study found that more than 55% of the programmes it evaluated did not show any link to a larger country strategy.The second identifies two key priority areas where improved coherence and coordination are likely to have the most meaningful impact.